I help people and institutions manage money. My firm is called Guzman Investment Strategies, a Florida-based registered investment adviser, with an office (where I am) in Austin, TX.
Email me if you think I might be able to help you.
Click here to sign up to receive Guzman & Company MLP equity research.
Monthly Archives: January 2012
The Alerian MLP Index finished January up 1.34%, the 13th positive January in the 17 years from when Alerian’s data starts, or 76% of the time. Not since 1999 has the MLP Index started the year with a positive month and finished the year with a negative total return. That may sound great, but consider that the MLP Index has gone up in 118 out of 192 months during that same span, or 61% of the time, and the MLP Index has only finished negative 4 years out of 16. So, MLPs are up most months anyway, January’s are just up a little bit more on average.
The outperformance for January relative to other months can be accounted for with two seasonal factors:
- First, the 4 best months for MLP prices have been the first month of each quarter (January: average return 3.5%, March: 2.4%, July: 2.4%, October: 1.5%). I believe this is a result of the distribution cycle. Most distributions are paid at the beginning of the second month of each quarter, so there is usually buying in advance of distribution payouts (and selling afterwards).
- Second, January specifically gets a boost from tax loss related selling in December and pent up buying from rebalancing at the beginning of each year.
While MLPs are up, it doesn’t feel great when the S&P 500 is up 4.4% during the same time, when on average the MLP Index has outperformed the S&P 500 in January by an average of 342 basis points since 1996. However, 2012 at -301 basis points is not the weakest showing ever; in 2004 the S&P 500 beat the MLP Index by 419 basis points. MLPs finished 2004 with 16.7% total returns, which I think we’d take this year.
This year marks the 5th January out of 17 that MLP Index has under-performed the S&P 500 for January. Again, this is more a virtue of the MLP Index usually outperforming the S&P 500 on any given month than a January-specific issue. In 2 of the previous 4 instances (1999 and 2002), the MLP Index finished with negative total returns for the full year, so that doesn’t tell us much.
Also of note, February has been the second worst month in terms of average price change over the years at -0.79%, so stay on your toes.
If You Ain’t First, You’re Last
I’ll have more on individual MLPs later this week, but Capital Products Partners (CPLP) is in the lead at the 1 month checkpoint with +28%, and Inergy (-22%) is being lapped by everyone. Those are two MLPs I don’t have in my portfolio and probably won’t this year, too volatile for me. The top performing MLPs each year tend to really hurt you stomach if you own them, because of how much they bounce around.
Unlike Ricky Bobby’s philosophy in the video above, I think the smarter play in the MLP space is to have more winners than losers. So, it’s nice to see CQP up 17%, EXLP up 16% and NKA up 15%, but I’m fine holding NGLS and ETE (each up 5% so far this year).
Disclosure: The information in this article is not meant to be financial advice, we are not your financial advisor and I am posting my comments for informational purposes only. Long ETE and NGLS.
MLPs had a flat week, despite a sharp rebound in natural gas prices, and despite the Alerian MLP price index breaking through 400 for the first time ever. The Fed’s mid-week announcement that it would keep interest rates extra low through 2014, helped push MLPs and other assets higher through Thursday.
A sharp sell off Friday of 1.5% erased all gains for MLPs on the week. Friday’s drop was somewhat a result of broader market weakness, but also a result of 10 MLPs going ex-dividend Friday, including bell-weathers Enterprise Products (EPD) and Kinder Morgan Energy (KMP).
That broader stock market weakness Friday resulted from news of weaker economic growth than expected, with only 3.2% nominal growth, the slowest such rate since Q32009. FOMC action this week pushed treasury rates lower (10-year back below 2%), and gold higher.
The MLP equity offering pace slowed this week, with just 2 equity deals for under $500 million in gross proceeds. Also, of note, there have been no filings for MLP IPOs in January and no updates of previously filed S-1’s, so looks like the MLP IPO market is not going to be as hot as it was last year.
Natural gas’ 14.5% bounce may have legs given the announcement by Chesapeake ($CHK) on Monday. CHK announced that as a result of the lowest natural gas prices in a decade, it plans to curtail gas production by as much as 1.0 bcf per day in 2012 and reduce its operated dry gas rig count by more than 50% from 50 rigs to 24 rigs. Chesapeake plans to reallocate capital investment into liquids-rich plays (press release).
Dry gas shale plays like the Barnett Shale and Hayneville shale will be affected most by the strategic shift. CHK’s midstream subsidiary MLP, Chesapeake Midstream ($CHKM), has a contract mix with CHK that includes minimum volume commitments and fee-based payment structures. CHKM was nonetheless down 5.9% on the week, even with a 4.0% quarter over quarter distribution increase announcement on Thursday.
Other gathering and processing MLPs might be affected by future production curtailments from other producers in the Barnett and Haynesville shales. Since 2008, G&P MLPs have mostly shifted towards a fee-based contract mix, to avoid the double whammy of declining volumes and declining margins that they experienced in 2008.
Even with contract mixes that make all cash flow fee-based, G&P MLPs are exposed to volume risk. Contracts can mitigate that risk as well, with minimum volume commitments, but usually the minimum volume commitments are well below the volume management is expecting when the contracts are signed.
Other G&P MLPs that might see production curtailments akin to CHK’s around their assets include:
- Assets in the Barnett and Fayetteville shale areas
- 85% of CMLP’s volumes still come from Quicksilver Resources
- 95% of cash flow from fixed fee contracts
- Slightly less than 50% of cash flow from Barnett Shale
- EXLP has significant operations in dry gas areas, and depends on dry gas production to drive its business, so if more production cuts are coming, that should be a short term negative for EXLP.
Midstream MLPs with operations focused on liquids-rich areas where drilling is expected to continue to grow should be fine. The current environment is set to produce larger disparities than ever before between the winners and losers in the MLP space. The haves (crude and NGL-focused midstream players in areas of growing production) and the have nots (propane, natural gas storage MLPs, natural gas pipelines) are not usually this far apart.
(Clubber Lang’s prediction for fight against Rocky: Pain)
NRGY: My Prediction? Pain, Pro-PAIN
NRGY’s slow motion train wreck finally hit its climax Friday. Hopefully most of you got off the train a while back and were just rubberneckers as it unfolded. Propane distribution continues to be a challenging business, which is not new news. However, it seemed as though the propane MLPs were going to be able to maintain cash distributions and muddle through the challenging environment. That sentiment seems to have changed for the worse on Friday for NRGY, when the company added some comments to its announcement of a flat distribution for the quarter (my emphasis added):
“For the twelve months ended December 31, 2011, Inergy generated distributable cash flow of approximately 68% of the total cash distributions paid for the period. Market conditions, primarily in its propane operations and to a lesser extent in the Texas gas storage market, remain challenging. Although there are a number of factors that may impact its operations through the remainder of this fiscal year, a material improvement in distribution coverage is not expected. In light of these factors, management is conducting an evaluation of the operating businesses at Inergy, and is in the process of a major cost reduction initiative in its propane operations. In addition, management and the board of directors of Inergy are evaluating a reset of the quarterly distribution to a level that is supportable by the cash flow expected to be generated from Inergy’s businesses in the near term.”
So, in summary, cash flow last year was only 68% of distributions, things are not improving fast enough, the Inergy Midstream transaction was a marginal positive, but conditions didn’t improve fast enough in order to maintain its distribution. It seems like NRGY management is still holding out hope that some miracle will occur that will enable them to not reset their distribution, but the market is not so hopeful, as evidenced by the 23.6% drop in NRGY’s price Friday.
We’ve been watching this play out for a while. I started writing about it in middle of last year (see below), but the decline really started in Early May.
- July 22: “Propane Tank’s Empty” – recapping how Citi had downgraded the sector, sending NRGY down sharply that week.
- December 20: “Snowless in Boston: Impact on MLPs” – highlighted that weather was not going to save propane MLPs
On May 3, 2011, NRGY closed above $40 for the last time. The next day was the ex-date for its quarterly distribution, and May 10th NRGY announced earnings that disappointed. At the NAPTP conference in May, I remember how disappointed a few long term holders were in that earnings report, and the savvy ones got out soon after that earnings report, into June and July.
NRGY issued $324mm of equity at $36 in late May, and NRGY held flat for a month or so, until Citi’s downgrade and $31.50 price target report in mid-July. Weak earnings announcements in August and November, coupled with warm weather, helped assure that NRGY would not recover. NRGY has its earnings call Tuesday morning, so we’ll all get more color, and expected to hear some unhappy Q&A at the end of it.
Other propane MLPs aren’t doing well either. $APU announced earnings this week, and the results were ugly (press release). APU saw a 14% year over year drop in volumes, resulting from warmer weather (16% warmer than last year) and customer conservation resulting from high commodity prices (14% higher year over year increase in propane prices). The main difference is that even in the face of terrible operating conditions, APU has a 1.2x distribution coverage ratio, almost twice as much as NRGY. APU faces plenty of headwinds, but isn’t in distressed territory like NRGY at this point.
More earnings to come this week, buckle up…
26 MLPs announced distributions this week (16 increases, 10 flat). So far this quarter, 57 MLPs have announced distributions, 35 (61%) raised distributions. Average distribution growth has been 1.5% quarter over quarter. This week:
- CPLP, ETP, LINE, NMM, NRGY, NS, OXF, PSE, RNO, STON held distribution flat
- CLMT increased 6.0%
- EROC increased 5.0%
- MWE increased 4.1%
- ARLP increased 3.7%
- BBEP increased 3.4%
- PVR increased 2.0%
- WPZ increased 2.0%
- MMP increased 1.9%
- APL increased 1.9%
- SXL increased 1.6%
- DPM increased 1.6%
- RGP increased 1.1%
- HEP increased 1.1%
- SEP increased 1.1%
- EXLP increased 1.0%
- OILT increased 0.7%
Jan 27th, 2012
MLP Market Post
comments: Comments Off
The story this week, until NRGY blew up (figuratively) on Friday, was natural gas prices bouncing 14.5%. A combination of (1) curtailed dry gas production announcement from Chesapeake, (2) some happy talk on natural gas as the clean answer from President Obama in his State of the Union Address, and (3) how low gas prices were last week helped ensure the bounce. As a result of stronger commodity prices, royalty trusts had a strong week, up 5.2% on average. MLPs and stocks were helped by the Fed’s announcement that it would be keeping rates low through 2014, but MLPs were held back on Friday after several large distribution ex-dates (notably $KMP and $EPD) saw investors taking money off the table.
NRGY had a rough Friday, falling more than 23.5% on the distribution announcement press release it released, more on that in Week Thoughts later this weekend. It is interesting to see that NRGY’s new public subsidiary, $NRGM, was in the top 5 this week after research initiation pieces came out with glowing reports. NRGM is now up 6.5% this year, compared with NRGY down 29%, pretty amazing disparity. NRGY’s drop overshadowed a rough week for Chesapeake Midstream ($CHKM), which dropped 5.9% this week on news of curtailed dry gas drilling plans out of parent company $CHK. more on that later as well.
MLPs are set to finish January positive as usual, but stocks are winning so far this year, as investors seem to be feeling less defensive and are favoring stocks over MLPs right now. Interesting to see stocks and gold going in the same direction, but gold’s move probably has something to do with the Fed’s commitment to lower rates at the expense of the dollar, which was down this week and down on the year. Royalty trusts are down for the year following oil and gas prices down. General partners are outperforming again.
All top five MLPs are small caps that were beaten down last year. As investors become less defensive, expect this trend to continue with small cap recovery stories beating large cap MLPs that are going to get sold as investors exit the ETF and ETNs in favor of other stocks. Bottom five is dominated by propane MLPs, but also includes SXL and CMLP. SXL appears to have lost steam after a 40%+ year last year saw some analysts cutting ratings and price target on valuation and slowing growth now that crude spreads have narrowed. CMLP appears to be struggling because its assets are largely in dry gas areas, which may see production declines with natural gas prices so low.
So, those are the numbers this week, more thoughts coming later in the weekend.